Archive for the ‘Malaysian Law News’ Category

Clients can seek compensation from Bar Council for lawyers’ dishonesty

Thursday, June 7th, 2012

Copyright (c) 123RF Stock Photos

By TS Tan

A client can seek compensation from the Malaysian Bar Council for any financial loss due to his lawyer’s dishonesty. The redress comes in the form of a grant from the Advocates and Solicitors Compensation Fund, which was established in 1978.

A claimant can apply for compensation after his lawyer’s misappropriation of  money or the client’s loss involving money held from an estate or for a real estate closing. Negligence is however not considered. So far, claims as small as RM178.20 and as large as RM468,012 have been settled.

Under Section 80 (8) of the Legal Profession Act 1978, a claim may be entertained provided certain procedures and conditions are complied with. For instance, a prerequisite is that the lawyer concerned must be first struck off the roll before a client submits a claim.

Claims should be made within 21 days from the date of the Bar Council’s notice of a list of disbarred lawyers published in newspapers. Applications for compensation can also be submitted within six months or a period not exceeding two years after a financial loss is discovered.

A claimant is required to submit two forms – A and B – given by the Bar Council Secretariat or downloaded from its website (www. Malaysianbar.org.my). Form A is for the report of a financial loss caused by a breach of trust by an advocate and solicitor who is a member of the Bar Council. A claimant uses Form B to apply for compensation, providing full details of the claim and attaching relevant documents.

He or she must submit a certified true copy of a police report lodged by the claimant against the lawyer, a photocopy of his/her identity card or passport and other supporting evidence for the claim. A cheque or postal order for RM100  as the administrative fee is also required.

Panel reviews claims

All documents may be mailed or presented to the Compensation Fund Department (Jabatan Dana Pampasan), Bar Council Malaysia, 15 Leboh Pasar Besar, , 50050 Kuala Lumpur. A claimant may also seek advice from the council’s secretariat (tel: 03-2031 3003 or fax: 03-2026 1313/2034 2825/2072 5818).

An adjudication panel comprising senior lawyers will review the application before inviting the claimant to attend a hearing together with witnesses and produce the original documents. The panel will next submit a written report with recommendations on whether the claim should be approved in part or in full, or rejected. The Bar Council will have the final say on the claim.

The council may also recommend a legal suit for civil remedy, criminal proceedings against a defaulting lawyer or action by a disciplinary board.

First mooted by veteran lawyer JSH Skrine in 1972, the compensation fund was introduced to protect the interests of lawyers’ clients who suffer losses as a result of dishonest acts committed by unscrupulous advocates and solicitors. It is also aimed at safeguarding the reputation of the legal profession.

The council does not restrict the number of claims made per year. In 2007, it received a total of nine claims for amounts in excess of RM1.5 million and it approved more than RM1.4 million for such claims in 2009.

Claims that are not considered

The process of obtaining compensation may take a year or longer, depending on the nature and complexity of a case. The council does not entertain claims for losses when a lawyer is not acting in his professional capacity or when they are caused by a default of a client’s personal loan advanced to his lawyer or suffered  in a business venture. It also does not consider payments made to lawyers as legal fees.

The fund is accrued from the yearly RM100 contribution by each of the Bar Council’s 12,800-odd members. It currently stands in excess of RM12.8 million.

The council may use its discretion to invest the fund’s surplus in worthwhile projects. It may also borrow money from the fund with an annual interest set by the Malaysian Association of Bankers. Its members may also obtain loans from the fund.

Other countries have established similar compensation funds with some variants. In Singapore, for example, it has the Law Society’s Compensation Fund which covers financial losses caused not only by dishonest lawyers but also their staff in failing to pay or deliver trust money or trust property.

Staff lawyer assigned

In the US, a government-mandated client compensation fund is available. Each lawyer is required to pay a biennial registration fee of US$375, which is considered to be excessive.

In dealing with claims, the Law Society of Upper Canada assigns a staff lawyer to recommend each case to its fund’s review committee, which makes the final decision, or prepares a report for consideration.

The Solicitors Regulation Authority of the UK deliberates over similar claims which can be made not only because of a lawyer’s dishonesty, but also because of his failure to account for money received. The claimant may not necessarily be a client or a former client.

In some countries, there is a distinction between the duties of an advocate or barrister and those of a solicitor. An advocate in the UK pleads cases in court, whereas a solicitor deals with out-of-court work, gives legal advice, prepares cases for barristers or represents clients in certain lower courts. In the US, an attorney is permitted to handle both office and trial work.

A distinction does not exist in Malaysia where the duties of advocates and solicitors are fused. Both are therefore allowed to present cases in higher courts.

ALSA INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE 2012

Thursday, April 19th, 2012

The congregation of regional minds produces unexpected sparks in all aspects of life. To foster stronger relationships across borders and to grow progressively as a regional community was our ultimate goal. Such phrases would best describe the gist of what ALSA Malaysia is and the philosophical pinnacle of ALSA Conference 2012.

ALSA Malaysia, also known as Asian Law Students Association of Malaysia serve as a platform of regional law students gather and exchange intellectual thoughts and ideas which would help the association grow as a whole. The ulterior intention of the existence of such organization is also to build social network across borders in the region. To put that idea into perspective, ALSA International Conference is held annually for members all over Asia to meet at a host country and to discuss global issues of the present day.

As such, the theme for the current ALSA International Conference 2012 focuses on the issue of global sustainability. As one of the many leading global issues of the day, it is not an easy issue to be tackled with and a noble notion indeed ALSA has to have such an ambitious purview of the theme of the event.

The first 3 days of the conference centralizes tackling the issue from the academic perspective. Model United Nation, a simulator of round table talks between national representatives from members of the United Nations was conducted frequently to discuss and resolves selected issues as a whole. A mooting competition with environmental law as its theme was also conducted simultaneously in order to let universities compete on a regional scale. It is also riveting to watch this competition as all of the mooters have different points of view and certainly employed different angle of analyzing the moot question as all of them adopt a different set of culture, and thus rendering their method of presentation to be distinctively different from each other, despite the fact there are only subtle inconsistencies in terms of their thinking patterns and mentalities. All in all, the academic activities conducted throughout the conference have achieved its purpose which is to allow members of ALSA to exchange thoughts and ideas intellectually.

The remaining days of the conference exposed the participants of its lighter side as tours were arranged to various parts of the country, such as the Historical Town of Malacca, Genting Highlands and so forth. Mentally exhausted by rigorous academic activities, it is vital to have these non-academic components in place in order to tone down the formal and rigid atmosphere of the conference. As a fellow Malaysian, it is also heart-warming to see the international participants to experience the hospitality the country has to offer. It also certainly highly satisfying to acknowledge the fact that international participants appreciated every single moment they spent in the conference, especially during the farewell dinner where all participants savored their last moments in the conference together in a massive exchange of contacts, photography sessions and sing-alongs.

On a final note, ALSA International Conference 2012 has worked wonders in translating its motto into an unforgettable gathering experience, which is “ALSA Always be One”. Special thanks to all of the event’s sponsors:

All Lawyers Should Have An iPad!

Thursday, October 27th, 2011

Copyright (c) 123RF Stock Photos

This article is contributed by Mr Foong Cheng Leong

Well, this article is not only about the iPad but also about other tablets in the market. Tablets such as Samsung Galaxy Tab or Blackberry Playbook are good examples, but they are not my focus here.

For me, my iPad is probably one of the most useful tools in my practice. It helps me with the following:-

Research
An internet-enabled iPad is very useful for quick research. Imagine you are in Court and you suddenly remember a case which would help your case. You can easily access legal publishing websites such as CLJ, Lexis-Nexis and even those of British and Irish Legal Information Institute (Baili). On a different note, Lexis-Nexis now has its own iPhone App. I understand that an iPad App for that will be out soon.

You can also store basic cases and statutes in your iPad. Since my practice is only limited to intellectual property matters, I keep a folder of relevant statutes such as the Trade Marks Act 1976, Patents Act 1983, Copyright Act 1987, Industrial Designs Act 1996, Franchise Act 1998 and Personal Data Protection Act 2010. This allows me to access them quickly without internet connection.

Accessibility 
With the right App (such as DropBox) or a proprietary software, you can access your files anywhere. Let say you need to look at a letter for a file; you can view straightaway it on your iPad.

I use DropBox to store my statues and legal cases – divided into various categories. For example, if I want to view a case regarding trade marks, I only need to access my Trade Marks folder.

Dropbox also synchronizes my folders in all my devices. For instance, the files that I keep in my PC will be the same as those in my iPad, so I can update the former.

If you have some money to spend, build a proprietary software or use a reputable software to make your files accessible remotely and securely.

But remember, everything that can be accessed on the internet, although secured by professionals, is not 100% secure. You wouldn’t want to end up like ACS:Law, a UK law firm who had some of its confidential information leaked online after its website was attacked. (more…)

Innovation and IP – What’s next for Malaysia

Thursday, May 19th, 2011

The road to becoming an IP based nation is a necessary one that Malaysia must take in order to become a high income nation.  The key to this is to increase innovation and thereby create home grown intellectual property assets from which can be derived economic benefits for businesses.  This path however is fraught with challenges and requires a road map, clear strategy and careful planning.

The Malaysian Intellectual Property Association (MIPA) is proud to host an Intellectual Property and Innovation conference to generate discussion on this important issue entitled “Innovation and IP – What’s next for Malaysia”, to be held in Empire Hotel, Subang Jaya from 22-23 June 2011.

This Conference will bring together national and regional experts from both fields of innovation and intellectual property and is intended to educate and inform the various government, technology, innovation and intellectual property communities and stakeholders on where Malaysia is today and where we should be going.  Some of the topics being shared and discussed include:

-          The National Innovation Policy (by UNIK from the Prime Minister’s office)

-          Latest IP law developments

-          Learning from USA and Japan on becoming an IP based nation

-          Green Technology and IP

-          Impact of the Madrid Protocol

-          How to build a strong brand

-          Competition law and IP

-          Getting grants and investments for IP based companies   

 This is an important conference not to be missed by anyone interested or involved in innovation or IP.  The early bird rates expire on 31 May 2011 and therefore interested participants need to sign up now.  Please contact the MIPA secretariat for more information at tel: 03-79603002 or email at secretariat@mipa.org.my  

 The conference details and registration forms can also be found in MIPA’s website at www.mipa.org.my

Contract Risk & Dispute Management

Tuesday, January 4th, 2011

Harvesting maximum benefit from your commercial relationship via effective strategies in commercial risk mitigation and contractual disputes resolution

Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia | 9th & 10th May 2011

Bangkok, Thailand | 10th & 11th May 2011
 
Increasing commercial risk exposures, burden of litigation, heavy cost and time has been wasted on various cancellations and variations to commercial contacts resulting in increasing number of business disputes due to market volatility. Many organisations are looking at alternative ways of minimising and mitigating such instances, thus, considerations in legal risk from the very start is essential to mitigate any possible risk or disputes in the future.
 
The level of strategic focus on contract risk management is generally low and this in itself is a major risk for organisations. Many are now beginning to slowly realise and becoming more active in this aspect. In addition,  successful mediation, arbitration and negotiation is now seen as having a positive dimension, as it not only inexpensive and delivers fast outcome in disputing commercial cases, it benefit towards redefining business relationships.
 
Attend this dynamic 2-day course and benefit your organisation by allowing a greater hold in minimising risk, limiting losses and ensuring clarity from the very beginning whilst gaining the essential knowledge and success strategies in risk allocation, effective negotiation and conflict resolution.
 

Attend this informative event and gain practical insights into:

Identifying hidden risks in your current contracts through comprehensive and systematic review methods that will flag potential liability issues
Reviewing positive and practical steps that can be taken during the course of a contract to prevent and minimise the risks and number of claims
Discussing current tips, strategies and techniques in dispute resolution through mediation
Avoiding or minimising disputes through effective project management and risk assessment plans for contracts
Grasping strategies in enhancing relationships with the contractors and developers to strengthen the partnership
Mastering the art of negotiation and persuasion in winning an argument
Minimising cost contingencies and variations by identifying key contract management risks from the beginning
 

Who should attend:

 CEOs, COOs, Presidents, Vice Presidents, Managing Directors, Directors, General Managers, Senior Managers, Managers, Supervisors, Heads of the following areas:

• Legal Counsel

• Contract Advisors

• Project Professionals

• Procurement and Purchasing Managers

• Mediators

• Legal Advisors

• Lawyers

• Sale & Marketing Managers

• Business Development Managers

From these target sectors:

• Infrastructure & Construction

• Legal Firms

• Oil and Gas

• Petrochemicals and Chemicals

• Real Estate & Properties

• Heavy Industries

• Banking and Finance

• Conglomerates & Family Owned Businesses

• Retailing & Manufacturing

• IT and Telecommunications

 All eLawyer members are entitled to a discount of 10% when registering with Ms. Alexis Nair. For more information and registration, please contact Ms. Alexis Nair at T: +603 2723 6662 or email: alexisn@marcusevanskl.com

Whistleblower Protection Act 2010

Friday, December 24th, 2010

As an initiative to fight corruption, the Whistleblower Protection Act 2010 (Act 711) has been duly approved in Parliament on 6th May 2010 and came into force on Wednesday 15th December 2010.

This Act is to be implemented by all enforcement agencies eg: Police Force, Customs, Immigration, Malaysian Anti Corruption Commission etc., including ministries and departments under federal and state governments with investigative and enforcement authority.

The Act is formulated to encourage informers to expose corrupt practices and other misconduct. This move would provide immunity to informers from civil or criminal charges.

Based on Wikipedia “Whistleblower” is defined as:

“A whistleblower is a person who raises a concern about alleged wrongdoing occurring in an organization or body of people. Usually this person would be from that same organization. The alleged misconduct may be classified in many ways; for example, a violation of a law, rule, regulation and/or a direct threat to public interest, such as fraud, health/safety violations, and corruption. Whistleblowers may make their allegations internally (for example, to other people within the accused organization) or externally (to regulators, law enforcement agencies, to the media or to groups concerned with the issues).”

Under section 6 of the Whistleblower Protection Act 2010 “Whistleblower” is defined as “any person who makes a disclosure of improper conduct to the enforcement agency ”.  Under Section 6(1) of the Act, it is stated that a person may make a disclosure of improper conduct to any enforcement agency based on his reasonable belief that any person has engaged, is engaging or is preparing to engage in improper conduct Provided that such disclosure is not specifically prohibited by any written law.

Section 6(2) further states that a disclosure of improper conduct under subsection (1) may also be made although the person making the disclosure may not be able to identify a particular person to which the disclosure relates or although the improper conduct has occurred before the commencement of this Act.

Information acquired of any improper conduct of the said person while he was an officer of a public body or an officer of a private body is also relevant.

In the United States, legal protections vary according to the subject matter of the whistleblowing, and sometimes the state in which the case arises.

  • Lloyd-La Follette Act (1912)
  • Water Pollution Control Act (1972)
  • Safe Drinking Water Act (1974)
  • Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (also called the Solid Waste Disposal Act) (1976)
  • Toxic Substances Control Act (1976)
  • Energy Reorganization Act of 1974 (through 1978 amendment to protect nuclear whistleblowers)
  • Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA, or the Superfund Law) (1980)
  • Clean Air Act (1990)
  • Surface Transportation Assistance Act (1982)
  • Pipeline Safety Improvement Act (PSIA) (2002)
  • Wendell H. Ford Aviation Investment and Reform Act for the 21st Century (“AIR 21″)
  • Sarbanes-Oxley Act (2002) (for corporate fraud whistleblowers)
  • Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (2010) (for Securities whistleblowers)
  • Military Whistleblower Protection Act

It is apperent that US has adpoted a more specific approach in protecting the Whistleblower.

On the other hand, in the United Kingdom, the Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998 provides a framework of legal protection for individuals who disclose information so as to expose malpractice and matters of similar concern. In the vernacular, it protects whistleblowers from victimization and dismissal. (Source: Wikipedia)

We support the Government’s urge that anybody who has any report to make, need not worry as under Section 7(1), a whistleblower shall have protection of confidential information, immunity from civil and criminal action, and protection against detrimental action.

We congratulate the Government for finally implementing this Act. With the enforcement of this Act, we hope that integrity and professionalism among workers in all sectors, both private and government, would be increased accordingly.

Asia IP Awards 2010

Wednesday, December 15th, 2010

 

  

We are delighted to share the good news that Messrs Wong Jin Nee & Teo, advocates & Solicitors has been awarded the Winner of the 2010 Malaysia Trademark Firm of the Year Award.

This award was presented at the 2010 Asia IP Awards ceremony held in Hong Kong on 20th October this year.

The Asia IP Awards are based on an extensive poll of in-house counsel around the world, who were asked to nominate up to top three law firms in trademark and patent for in each of the 16 Asia-Pacific countries.

Once again, we extend our heartiest congratulations to Messrs Wong Jin Nee & Teo on winning this prestigious award.

Messrs Wong Jin Nee & Teo is an Intellectual Property and Technology boutique legal practice, providing a full spectrum of Intellectual Property and Technology services and acts as a one-stop-centre for organizations with issues relating to their Intellectual Property Rights (IPR).

Report on UM Law Career Convention 2010

Tuesday, October 19th, 2010

The UM Law Career Convention 2010 (LCC 2010), an annual legal career fair organized by the Law Society of University of Malaya was successfully held on 10 October 2010.

The LCC 2010 was officiated by the Associate Prof. Dr. Yong Chiu Mei who gave a warm welcome speech to all present. This convention was organised annually to provide opportunities for students to interact with representatives from law firms, government departments, organizations, both corporate and NGOs.

As usual we, eLawyer, are the regular participant and media partner in this event.

“Our friendly legal recruitment consultant, Ai Nin, was ready to provide consultation to the jobseekers”

“Candidates were signing up at our booth”

“The Director of this Convention, Mr Edmund and Prof Yong Chiu Mei were visiting our eLawyer booth”

“Eddie Law of eLawyer was interviewed by a reporter from the local press – News Straits Times”

This year, apart from us, the other participants consist of Albar & Partners, Kheng Hoe & Partners, Lee Hishammuddin Allen & Gledhill, Lee Ong & Kandiah, Mah-Kamariyah & Philip Koh, Michael Chai & Co, Shahrizat Rashid & Lee, Skrine, Thomas Phillip, Zaid Ibrahim & Co, the Bar Council, Malaysian Corporate Counsel Association, MyConstitution and Centre for Independent Journalism.

“Lee Hishammuddin Allen & Gledhill”

“Skrine – who has the biggest sign board and a pop-corn machine at their booth”

“Kheng Hoe & Partners, the new participanting law firm”

“Sharizat Rashid & Lee, another new participating law firm”

“Lee Ong & Kandiah was also new to this fair”

“Zaid Ibrahim & Co”

“Mah-Kamariyah & Philip Koh”

“Albar & Partners”

“Thomas Philip – lawyers conducting an interview on the spot”

“Michael Chai & Co”

“The Judicial and Legal Service Commission”  

Those who attended the LCC 2010 ranges from law students from University of Malaya, as well as those from other universities eg: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Multimedia University, etc. and private institutions eg: Taylor’s University College.

Informative talks were given by the representatives of participating law firms and organizations. The Bar Council started the first session with a talk on “Expectations of the Bar”, followed by Sharizat Rashid & Lee on “The Next Step”. The after lunch session consisted of talks by Skrine on “Legal Practice: What your mother didn’t tell you”, the Bar Council on “Professional Ethics”, Thomas Philip on “Dispute Resolution: The Way Forward”, and MyConstitution on “Merakyatkan Perlembagaan”. There were also scheduled talks from Lee Hishammuddin Allen & Gledhill, and the Malaysian Corporate Counsel Association.

Volunteers from the student body, mostly first year and second year law students, have assisted in making this convention a success. Much appreciated assistance was rendered in setting up consultation booths, tending to the participants’ needs and enquiries.

Awareness was also generated for the Global Youth Symposium 2010 (GYS 2010), LawNite 2010/2011 (LawNite), and VOX Magazine 2010/2011. This GYS 2010 event “Empowering Youth – Meeting Global Challenges” with the aim to tackle global issues like poverty, violence against children and global warming, will be held on 16th to 20th of December 2010. LawNite will be held on 26th February 2011. The organizing committees for these events were diligent and innovative to create awareness as well as to raise funds for these events.

“Eddie Law of eLawyer was receiving token of appreciation from the Director of this convention”

The closing ceremony was held in Auditorium Tun Mohamed Suffian, officiated by Yang Arif Tan Sri Dato’ Zulkefli bin Ahmad Makinudin, Judge of the Federal Court of Malaysia. The Dean of the Faculty of Law Professor Dr Choong Yeow Choy also made a speech where he thanked all participants’ support, as well as extended his congratulations to the organizing committee of the Law Society, headed by Edmund Cheuk, the Director of this LCC 2010 for making this event a great success.

eLawyer is proud to be the media partner for LCC 2010, and we congratulate the Law Society of University of Malaya for successfully holding this event.

UM Law Career Convention 2010

Tuesday, September 28th, 2010

 

The law society of University of Malaya again organises the annual legal career fair - UM Law Career Convention 2010 (LCC 2010), for law students and young lawyers to network with local law firms and corporations.

eLawyer is pround to be the media partner for this event again this year.

We have participated in this legal career fair since 2008 .

Currently, many law firms have confirmed their participations in this legal career fair and the organiser targets to attract more than 20 law firms/corporations to join this annual event.

Young lawyers and law students are encouraged and welcome to visit this LCC 2010 and the details are set out below:

Event Name: UM Law Career Convention 2010 (LCC)

Organiser: Law Society of University of Malaya

Venue: Law Faculty of University Malaya

Date: 9 October 2010

Time: 9am – 5pm

eLawyer will be setting up an exhibition booth there and please do come by to say Hello to us. (We provide free legal career consultation).

DATA PROTECTION LAW: TOO LITTLE, TOO LATE? by Professor Abu Bakar Munir

Monday, August 17th, 2009

I was invited by the Dean of Law Faculty of University of Malaya, Prof Abu Bakar Munir, to attend his recent public lecture entitled Data Protection Law: Too Little, Too Late on 4 August 2009.

Meeting Prof.  Abu Bakar Munir(left) at the lecture.

Below is the power point slide presentation used by Prof Abu Bakar Munir during the lecture:

Synopsis of Lecture

After a long wait of more than a decade, on 17 June 2009, the Deputy Minister of the Information, Communication and Culture announced in Parliament that the Personal Data Protection Bill is to be presented for the first reading in October 2009. The Deputy Minister stated, “We are determined to get it done this year. This Act is vital in protecting our privacy and to safeguard personal information”. This law affects almost every individual and organization, public or private, as data is the ‘bread and butter’ of an organization. The law also gives certain rights to individuals whose data are collected. This talk provides an overview of the international data protection instruments. It discusses the approaches adopted by the different jurisdictions in protecting personal data. In conclusion, it elaborates on the salient features of a data protection law and its effects and impact on an organization.

Speaker’s Profile

Abu Bakar Munir is an internationally renowned scholar, expert and consultant on ICT Law and data protection. He is a Professor of Law and the former Dean of the Faculty of Law, University of Malaya. He is the author of several books; Privatisation (1992), Cyberlaw: Policies and Challenges (1999), Privacy and Data Protection (2002), Internet Banking: Law and Practice (2004) and Information, Communication and Technology Law (2009) (in print). He has published articles widely on ICT Law, Air and Space Law and Nanotechnology Law. He speaks extensively at conferences around the globe including those organized by universities such as the Oxford, Cambridge and MIT.

Professor Abu Bakar Munir has been widely consulted by governments and private entities around the world. He was seconded as the IT Law Adviser and Principal Consultant to the Government of Dubai, UEA where he led an international team of consultants in developing and drafting several IT legislation to facilitate the Dubai Internet City, a multi-billion dollar IT project. He is currently the Adviser to the Government of Malaysia on data protection. Since 2007, he has been actively involved and instrumental in developing and drafting the above-mentioned Bill. He is also an Adviser to the Government of Indonesia and has recently completed drafting the Personal Data Protection Bill for the Republic.

He is a member of the United Nations ICT Policy and Internet Governance Working Group and a Council Member of the Asia Pacific Privacy Charter Council (APPCC). He is also an Expert to the Amicus Legal Consultants Ltd. London and an ICT Law Consultant to Dr. Colin Ong Legal Services, Brunei Darussalam. He is affiliated to many other organizations and is also a Visiting Professor at several universities, nationally and internationally.