UUM form this programme with a comprehensive plan. To become a Law graduates, ones need to undergo this 4 years programme. The Law Faculty complete the Law graduates with mock-trail practices, mooting competitions and the Law graduates will be send to participate in the Mooting Competitions or Client Counselling Competition organised by other University, so that the Graduates get the opportunities to learn from others and to be more confidence to represent other the next day.

The Programme require the students to undergo 2 times practical training during their semester break in the aim of what the students gain in lecture hall can be put into practice.

I truly appreciate the programme; it is a more advance programme than the others. The Programme completes the students with basic accounting knowledge, computer skills and management ability.

To maintain good relationship with other organisations, the Faculty hold Law Conference, Career Talk, Talk on Contemporary Issues each and every semester. Members from the Bar Council, Representatives from the AG Chambers, and Representatives from Government Organisation as well as private sectors are invited to share their experience and knowledge to the students.

BUT, the abovementioned hard works go down the ‘big’ drain. No matter how hard UUM, the Faculty, Law graduates and students try from first to last its mean nothing for the LQB. The time, money and hard works spend by the lecturers, the Government, the Law graduates and parents mean nothing to the tiger.

Imagine how much money the Government need to spend to produce a University Graduate. The University are required to follow the standard impose by the Ministry of Education and again its mean nothing to the tiger.

If there is any defect in the Law Programme why the tiger keep quite when the Faculty propose the programme to them. Since the Tiger Board is form by experienced members and always prepare to ‘BUAT KERJA’ they should suggest something. The TRUTH is the smiling tiger, hide their TEETH at the back and remain silent.
Now, the Law Graduates become the ‘food’. Who is going to give concern when the Graduates’ dream becomes nightmare? The parents are sad, the graduates are frustrated. This is what the smiling tiger with ‘goodwill’ from the Tiger Board want it to be and this is a comedy for the tiger.

That being said, i’m glad that i took an effort to initiate a meeting with my Mover (whom i approached myself after obtaining approval from my Pupil-Master) to discuss about changes , if any , to my Call Speech.

My only wish is that in future, the Pupil-Master ought to take an effort in providing some input about his/her pupil during their brief encounter of the 9 month pupillage period which in turn would be communicated to the Mover .This would add a finer touch to a truly personal experience for the Pupil ( at least that is how i perceive it to be!) .

The author is quite right to point out the disadvantages of the standard format which pupils are advised to adhere to . ( at this juncture, i too, must admit quite sincerely that i stuck to the guidelines for fear that anything different may be viewed in oddness!) .The common understanding is that lengthy speeches do take up too much of the Court’s time. However , a good speech may not necessarily be a lengthy one if there is cumulative effort , thought and feedback from the Pupil, the Pupil-Master and the Mover.

In this regard, it is humbling to learn that at least the author had the conscience and honesty to admit to his faults when he was asked to be a Mover on several occasions.

A piece of literature that best describes the Pupil’s chararcter ? A brilliant and novel idea ! Bring it on , i say .

Be that as it may, i must admit that the most memorable part of my Call day (not too long ago) was the Admission Judge’s Speech- those words still ring in my ears !